
Dressed Warmly for the Hot Season? How Companies Defy Disrupted Supply Chains
This year’s Berlin Fashion Week 2022 kicks off on September 3. For one week, there will be shows, various conferences, and even dinners here.
In 2022, we wrote about fashion, supply chains, and the heated phase before the end-of-year business rush. This retrospective is less of a fashion show and more of an engine room tour: Before clothing hangs in stores, someone has to finance goods, move containers, and convince suppliers.
- The article was published in the context of Berlin Fashion Week 2022, which started on September 3.
- Many textile and apparel companies suffered from disrupted global supply chains.
- Corona, the war in Ukraine, energy prices, fuel costs, and container freight rates increased the pressure.
- The text mentioned MODIFI as a global trade platform for payments and trade services.
- Extended payment terms of 30, 60, 90, or 120 days were intended to create liquidity for the peak season.

The fashion industry looks great in front, but tight at the back
The original text begins with Berlin Fashion Week 2022. Shows, conferences, and dinners provided the visible face of the industry. At the same time, many companies in the textile and apparel sector struggled with disrupted supply chains. The Christmas business was approaching; clothing and shoes may have already been ordered, but in tense supply chains, a single order is not enough. Those who do not appear financially strong enough to suppliers in Asia or the Middle East quickly fall to the back of the queue.
This is the sober side of fashion. Fabrics, shoes, collections, and displays require working capital before they generate revenue. Companies that must pre-finance stable growth often have worse cards than large, well-capitalized competitors when capacities are scarce. The original article names CEOs, buyers, CFOs, and others as those affected. This shows: supply chains are not just a logistics issue, but a financing question.
The text refers to MODIFI, a global trade platform for payments between businesses and trade services. Back then, MODIFI provided forecasts for supply chains in the second half of the year and for the Christmas season, offering a free whitepaper. The core message was clear: Those who know risks earlier and manage liquidity better stand more firmly with suppliers.
In peak season, it’s not just those with the better collection who win. It’s also those who can pay on time.
Why 2022 was so tense
The article describes several pressure points. It didn’t even take a container ship running aground in a strait like the Suez Canal. Global supply chains were heavily disrupted, especially since Corona. At the same time, Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine drove up energy prices and associated container freight costs. Knowing such risks could be worth its weight in gold.
Compounding factors included rapidly rising costs for energy and fuels. According to the original text, container shipping prices had recovered somewhat since their peak in April 2022, but remained three times higher than pre-Corona levels. China kept the world on edge with its zero-Covid policy, as Shenzhen stood before Hong Kong and Chengdu, the provincial capital of Sichuan, faced partial lockdowns due to local outbreaks.
Previously, ships had piled up off Shanghai because they were not allowed to depart. Natural disasters like earthquakes add to the problem, but according to the article, they usually have less lasting impact on global trade than events since early 2020. For an industry with seasonal collections, this is particularly critical. Goods that arrive late are not just delayed; they miss their moment.
Liquidity as a background style issue
The archived text offered some hope that while freight rates remained high, container availability increased. Additionally, part of production moved back to Europe, even after the debacle with face masks, to accelerate supply chains. This can shorten routes, but makes goods more expensive. For companies, having good standing with suppliers becomes crucial.
This is exactly where the purchase financing described in the article by MODIFI came into play. Extended payment terms of 30, 60, 90, or even 120 days were meant to bridge dry spells and secure liquidity for year-end business. According to the text, this improves relationships with suppliers and helps avoid falling behind larger companies in the flow of goods.
The platform was described as completely paperless and 100 percent digital. Shipments could be tracked online. If container freight stalls, customers know immediately and can take countermeasures, such as seeking alternatives. This sounds less glamorous than a runway, but is often more decisive for fashion companies. A dress that doesn’t arrive on time has no show.
The original text remained clear: Disrupted supply chains since Corona were a fact. It was equally factual that financially stronger companies often had priority with suppliers. MODIFI promised better terms, extended payment deadlines, liquidity, and additional working capital. From today’s perspective, the article reads as a snapshot of an industry that has learned that aesthetics without financing gets you nowhere.
Why the old text is still a lesson
Even though the article is clearly anchored in 2022, its mechanics remain understandable. The fashion industry works with deadlines. A collection has a time window, Christmas business has a time window, a delivery has a time window. If one of these breaks, it doesn’t just lead to higher costs, but missed sales and damaged relationships with retailers or customers.
The text also makes visible why small and medium-sized enterprises were under particular pressure. Large companies can pay faster, take larger volumes, and position themselves better in tight situations. Those who have to pre-finance additional resources need tools that stretch liquidity without paralyzing the business. That’s exactly why payment terms become a strategic lever.
The digital part is also interesting. Paperless processes and shipment tracking sound dry, but in a strained supply chain, information itself is a value. Whoever sees earlier that a cargo is stuck can react earlier. Whoever finds out later loses room for maneuver. In peak season, this difference is often greater than any beautiful presentation of a collection.
For the fashion industry, this is an unromantic, but honest look. Style doesn’t start in the shop window. It depends on planning, solvency, and the question of whether the right goods are really available at the right time.
That’s why the old article turns a financial topic into an industry topic. Whoever understands supply chains understands better why fashion prices, availability, and seasonal goods sometimes react so sensitively.
Quick Answers
▸What was the 2022 article about?
About disrupted supply chains in the textile and apparel industry and the question of how companies finance goods for the year-end business.
▸Which risks were mentioned?
Corona consequences, Ukraine war, energy and fuel costs, high container freight costs, China’s zero-Covid policy, and local lockdowns.
▸What should MODIFI do?
A purchase financing with extended payment terms and digital trade services, so that companies remain liquid.
▸Which payment terms were mentioned?
The old text mentions 30, 60, 90, or even 120 days.



